FLAGSHIP ASSESSMENT

Las Vegas headquartered. For professional firms that already have IT support.

Security Baseline & Resilience Assessment

An independent review of the agreed environment, with evidence-backed findings and a prioritized plan for management and the IT provider.

  • $8,500 typical scope
  • Larger environments scoped
  • Executive briefing included
  • Your MSP can stay
  • Separate from managed IT
  • Written scope before work starts
  • Findings ranked by severity

What leadership is trying to settle

Leadership is being asked whether client or customer information is actually protected: by an insurer, a client, a partner, or their own concern after a phishing attempt. The IT provider may be capable. What is missing is an independent account of the controls that matter, written for a managing partner. This is a cybersecurity assessment of an agreed environment. It is not managed IT, and it is not penetration testing. What the assessment includes and how that differs from a penetration test are explained separately.

Who it fits

Professional organizations, especially CPA, accounting, and tax firms of roughly 15 to 100 employees, and similar firms that handle sensitive information and rely on an MSP or a small internal IT team. The assessment is also the right first project for many wealth and advisory firms. It is a poor fit for a company that wants a new help desk, a 24/7 monitoring contract, or a certification badge.

What the review covers

  • Identity and accessPrivileged accounts, multifactor authentication, and who can change the important settings.
  • Email and business email compromiseThe safeguards that reduce impersonation and payment-fraud exposure.
  • Microsoft 365 or Google WorkspaceConfiguration of the tenant that holds mail, files, and identity.
  • EndpointsEvidence of security tooling and management, not a promise that every device was forensically imaged.
  • External exposureA vulnerability review of the agreed external surface.
  • Backup and recoveryArchitecture and evidence of restore capability.
  • Incident preparednessWhether roles, contacts, and a usable plan exist.
  • Policies and ownershipThe documents and named responsibilities that match the environment.

Evidence versus a direct test

Some controls are observed in configuration. Others are accepted on evidence the client or IT provider supplies, such as a backup report or a policy. Those are different levels of assurance. The register states which is which. Mojave does not describe every control as exhaustively validated.

Deliverables

  • FindingsEvidence-backed and ranked by severity.
  • Risk registerA structured list management can track.
  • Remediation roadmapPriority order, recommended owner, and a target date for each item.
  • Executive briefingOne meeting for management and the IT provider, covering the same facts.

Outside this engagement

The baseline is not penetration testing, exploitation, social engineering, forensic investigation, continuous monitoring, implementation of all fixes, source-code review, or a compliance certification. It is not a legal opinion.

What we need from you

A named management contact, a named IT contact, agreement on the tenants and locations in scope, and timely access to the evidence sources in the proposal. If a source cannot be produced, the finding is marked unavailable rather than assumed safe.

How it runs

1

Scope

The scoping call and a written proposal fix the environment, the fee, and the boundaries.

2

Review

We inspect the agreed evidence and controls with the IT provider or internal team.

3

Brief

You receive the register, the roadmap, and the executive briefing.

4

Next step

Your team implements, or Mojave scopes written-plan work, oversight, or engineering separately.

Assessment questions

Scope, testing, and price

We already have IT support. Why would we hire Mojave?

You can keep that relationship. Mojave is engaged separately to assess important controls, explain the findings to management, and hand your MSP or internal IT team a prioritized plan. Where a specialist gap remains, implementation help is available under its own scope.

Do you test every control, or review evidence of it?

Both happen, and they are not the same thing. We inspect agreed configuration and evidence, and we note where a control was only described rather than observed. We do not claim that every control was exhaustively validated. Findings say what was reviewed and what was unavailable.

Does this certify compliance?

No. Mojave does not issue a certification, a CPA attestation, or a statutory audit opinion. A written plan does not, by itself, establish that safeguards are operating or that a regulation has been met. Insurance eligibility and claim payment are decisions for your insurer.

Is this penetration testing?

The baseline reviews agreed evidence and configuration. It does not include exploitation, social engineering, or an attack simulation. Authorized penetration testing is considered only when a client requirement justifies it, under written rules of engagement and a qualified delivery arrangement.

Will you implement the fixes?

The assessment identifies what should change and who should own it. Your IT provider or internal team can carry out the plan. Mojave can track that work on a retainer, or provide hands-on engineering under a separate scope. The assessment fee does not include implementing every finding.

How are price and timing confirmed?

The prices shown describe a typical scope. User count is only one factor. Tenants, locations, and system complexity can change the price. After the scoping call you receive a written proposal with the fee, the boundaries, and what we need from you. Work begins when that proposal is accepted. A completion date is set in that proposal, after the delivery scope is known.

See whether this scope fits

The call is 30 minutes. If a fixed assessment is the right first project, you receive a written proposal. The call is not a free technical assessment.